Real Improvement: It’s Just a Game!
Everyone wants to improve.  However, most people tend to think of improvement in terms that are “too local” and “too transactional”.   By “too local”, most people narrow the problems they face down to what they can control and tend to shrug off anything outside their control as someone else’s problem.  By “too transactional”, most people think in terms of applying the fix to the problem and arriving at success.  In order to survive, leaders have to take the broadest possible view of business, customers, and competition and apply a multi-level, multi-player game strategy approach to driving improvement.
A multi-level, multi-player game is typically too big and too complex for those playing the game to totally comprehend and control.  With ever-faster technology change, increasingly innovative competition, and customers who always want more for less, charting a strategy that is guaranteed to win is difficult – particularly if one is looking for a “one step fix”.  The best strategy to win the prize in a multi-level, multi-player game is to learn as much as you can, get started with the best approach you know, measure how you are doing, and be willing to evolve your strategy and tactics as you learn more.
In order to be guaranteed to succeed at business, one would have to have perfect knowledge of their evolving business (e.g.customers, stakeholders, employees, competitors, technology, global economy) and be able to react instantly to any changes.  Rather than feeling like they have such “perfect knowledge”, most leaders I know are so busy dealing with what is on their plate right now that they have no time to learn about what might be happening “out there” that might impact.  No one person can possibly know enough to succeed today – one has to develop a “fast learning, fast acting” culture.
A “fast learning, fast acting” culture is most analogous to a “team on combat patrol”.  Someone has to take point and lead the way.  Someone must scout the area the team will cross for danger.  Everyone on the team has to know their role and be both willing and able to do it well.  Everyone has to know the plan and be able to adapt in real time when the plan has to change.  Most importantly, everyone has to be willing to put team success ahead of personal success.  A team without these factors is much less likely to safely achieve their objectives.
In a multi-level, multi-player game, it’s not possible to know all the (seemingly random) factors that will impact your fate.  The best one can do is to know your starting point, know your desired goal, know your team, and start off in the right direction.  The key to the desired “fast learning, fast acting” culture key to  success is frequent performance measurements relative to the goal, fast diagnosis of reasons for any widening gaps, and immediate corrective action to close those gaps and move closer to the goal.  This rapid, iterative learning process can’t just take place in the CEO’s office or even just in HQ – it has to be an integral part of the culture of the whole company – everyone has to learn and fix as fast as possible.
The only way to lead a team into a “fast learning, fast acting” culture that can navigate its way through the maze of today’s multi-level, multi-player business game is to listen, learn, and listen some more.  As the leader, one must put the “act, measure, diagnose, correct” iterative learning process into practice and show the team how it’s done.  As others “get it”, task them with “spreading the gospel” by asking them to make improvement projects happen.  This kind of change has to start at the top, find its way to the front lines, and then permeate the company from the ground up (which will only happen if leaders model and expect this behaviour relentlessly until it is second nature to everyone in the company).     
Ryder Cup and Post-Modern Leadership
In the aftermath of the recent European Ryder Cup demolishing of the USA, many have said that the USA team was simply outplayed during the matches.  I disagree.  There were no significant differences in the 2 teams in talent, desire to win, or pressure they experienced.  However, when it came down to crunch time, the European players made the key putts and erased the early deficits and won going away.  The question is, with so many similarities between the two teams, what made the difference?  I believe that the short answer is “leadership style”.  The recent Ryder Cup can teach us a lot about the type of leadership required for businesses to survive and thrive in today’s tough environment.
Businesses need a different type of leadership in order to both survive and thrive in today’s tough business climate.  Both captains wanted their 2014 Ryder Cup teams to win, but the European was a better "servant leader" who engaged in a "caring, constructive dialogue" with his team (i.e. listening to their ideas, being willing to take their input, and showing them he cared about them as people even when he didn't agree with them) and who fostered the "supportive, celebrative community" spirit that made the difference in the European team when times were tough.  The triumph of the European team in the recent Ryder Cup matches is a striking illustration of how crucial this new style of leadership is to running a successful business (both now and in the future). 
The recent European Ryder Cup team all commented extensively on how much time their captain invested in them in the two years leading up to the latest competition and how much discussion they had with him regarding the approach to the matches.  Most team members today demand dialogue with their leaders.  If they believe that their leaders care about them and have truly taken their input into account, they will remain engaged and do their best even when the decision is not in line with their input.  The recent European Ryder Cup team’s success shows that “caring, constructive dialog with a leader they trust” is a key factor in a team’s engagement.
The leadership style of their captain made the European team willing to forego the normal, selfish attitude for which golfers are famous.  However they played, the European team knew deep in their bones that their captain would "have their backs".  The captain’s attitude was infectious and the entire team became a “supportive, celebrative community” that freed the European to perform their best under pressure and to prevail in the crucial Sunday singles matches.  High performance in the face of adversity is much more likely if the person feels like they are part of something bigger than themselves who truly cares for them (i.e. a "supportive, celebrative community"). 
The European captain spent time over two years (often at the expense of his own personal success) frequently having dinner with his team, talking to them on the phone regularly, and spending 3 nights at the home of the most introverted, private person on the team to understand him better.  He even talked to the players' caddies to learn more about what made the players tick.  As a leader, he was truly serving in the team's best interest and the team knew it and responded wholeheartedly to him. 
The European captain in the recent Ryder Cup matches demonstrates the leadership style that businesses need to emulate to be successful.  In order to motivate our team to deal with tough global competition and with shifting technology trends in a manner that wins more than it loses, we must be "servant leaders" who engage in "caring, constructive dialogue" with our team and who lead them into a "supportive, celebrative community" that enables them to handle adversity and still triumph.  Today’s employees don't follow someone because they are smart - they follow people they trust who care about them and who listen to them.  As one of my friends says, "They don't care what you know until they know that you care."  
August 27, 2011

Lasting Legacy?

 After leaving a start-up that died in the "internet bubble" back in 2001, I was asked what my goal was for future jobs.  My answer was that "I wanted to build something that lasts."

Given how many companies are built up only to be sold off, it's hard to find anything that endures if one looks only at the company institutions themselves.  I believe that the only lasting legacy (for good or for ill) is the impact one has on the people they work with.

In order to determine what sort of legacy...


Hide Comments (0)       Add a new comment
August 27, 2011

Multi-Dimensional Thinking: Dead End or Solution?

 Most businesses end up focusing on one of the main business drivers that everyone is familiar with:

- reducing costs
- improving quality
- increasing innovation

Sometimes ambitious companies will tackle a couple of these at once (improving quality while cutting costs or increasing innovation and improving quality) but the conventional wisdom is that any company trying to be the best at all three (i.e. lowest cost, highest quality, and most innovative) is doomed to failure.  The problem...


Show Comments (0)       Add a new comment
July 24, 2011

How Important Is "Employment Equity"?

To begin, please be clear that I am not talking about "employee equity" (i.e. people owning stock in the company they work for).  That is an important topic but my focus right now is on "employment equity", which I define as "the experience, relationships, and good will one builds up while working at a company for a period of time".  When one considers new roles in their current company or offers they receive from elsewhere, I think that it is important to consider the "equity" you have built...


Show Comments (0)       Add a new comment
July 1, 2011

What Do Blackberries and Improved Efficiency Have In Common?

 First, let me correct a likely misperception based on the title of this blog entry.  When I mention "blackberries", I don't mean the smartphone you likely thought of.  I mean the real blackberries that grow on the prickly brambles here in the southwestern tail of North Carolina where I am visiting my dad and step-mother at my step-brother's place.

My dad and I went out this morning to pick ripe blackberries from several brambles scattered around the property.  For anyone who hasn't had that...


Show Comments (1)       Add a new comment
May 8, 2011

How Should We Plan For The Future?

With today's focus primarily on quarterly performance, long term planning often involves looking beyond the current year to decide what investments to make. Thinking about this tendency, it seems to me that today's executives need to know both what direction they are heading and what choices they may have to make along the way to change direction.  

If this is true, then the next question is whether this is any different from the past. As I think back to how strategic planning has been done in...


Show Comments (0)       Add a new comment
May 1, 2011

What Should You Do If Someone "Screws Up"?

Whether you are an executive, a manager, or a member of a team, everyone has experience with someone they are counting on "screwing up".  Sometimes errors are easily fixable and sometimes it takes a lot of time and money to repair the damage resulting from the mistake.  I believe that the response to mistakes (especially big ones) are big indicators of a company's culture, a leader's effectiveness, and a person's ability to be successful

I believe that everyone has heard the phrase "everyone m...


Show Comments (1)       Add a new comment
April 16, 2011

What Is "System Thinking" Anyway?

 You may have heard of the term "Systems Thinking" and, if you are like many people I have mentioned the term to, you probably rolled your eyes and thought "here we go again - another foray into arcane theory".  However, I believe that each one of us actually engages in "Systems Thinking" regularly - we just don't realize it.

To help explain why I believe I know what is going on inside your head, let me quote something I heard recently:  "A system is just a way of looking at the world". So, i...


Show Comments (1)       Add a new comment
April 9, 2011

Credibility, EQ, and Motivation

 Often times we associate credibility with "being right" or "people listening to our recommendations".  I believe that this is an accurate definition when considering our individual contributions to our team and our company.  However, I believe that credibility means something different when applied to one's leadership effectiveness.

I believe that a leader's credibility is the most crucial component in the leader's ability to motivate their staff to improved performance.  However, I believe...


Show Comments (0)       Add a new comment
April 2, 2011

Earning (& Keeping) Credibility

It seems that people who are just starting out in their career tend to assume that people in their company will automatically listen to what they have to say and act on their recommendations.  After all, the company hired them based on their background and credentials - why wouldn't the people in the company listen to them?

I believe that, just like elsewhere in life, one has to earn the right to be heard in an organization one has joined (whether one is early in their career or is experienced...


Show Comments (1)       Add a new comment
March 18, 2011

Key to Success

Many people just starting out in their careers wonder how they can be successful in their career.  The following story (not original with me) provides the best answer I know to the question "What is the secret of success?".

A young manager came to the office of a senior manager and asked for a minute of his time.  After a bit of small talk, the young manager asked the senior manager "What is the secret of your success?".  The senior manager answered "That's easy - good decisions."  The youn...


Show Comments (1)       Add a new comment
tiangle  2011
tiangle  August (2)
dot Lasting Legacy?
dot Multi-Dimensi...
tiangle  July (2)
tiangle  May (2)
tiangle  April (3)
tiangle  March (1)